I can totally get why people are confused about my position on Trump.
The thing is, I completely agree with Trump's rants against the mainstream media while still rejecting him as an "America's solution" in any other way.
Negative sentiments against the mainstream legacy media were really felt by many others long before he became a candidate. Each cause or perspective respectively beheld by all that were not "status quo" were seen as marginalized by a profit corporatized media agenda. Trump just tapped into the angry white American version of that angst and, further, personalized it making it seem that the point of it all is his persecution.
Trump has hijacked the valid concept of inauthentic news media.
Trump doesn't even articulate the argument against the media well. He calls the legacy media the generators of "fake news" but that's not really accurate. The "news" is real enough, it's more often than not that they are weavers of arbitrary if not contrary focus -- focusing on stories and narratives that have nothing to do with what day to day people are actually caring about. The Russian influence of American elections is one example.
Of course it's a bad thing that the Russians try, but it's been well known enough that Russia has been interferring with our elections, and we, their elections, for as long as we have been rivals. Over 50 years.
From the linked New York Times article:
Loch K. Johnson, the dean of American intelligence scholars, who began his career in the 1970s investigating the C.I.A. as a staff member of the Senate’s Church Committee, says Russia’s 2016 operation was simply the cyber-age version of standard United States practice for decades, whenever American officials were worried about a foreign vote.
“We’ve been doing this kind of thing since the C.I.A. was created in 1947,” said Mr. Johnson, now at the University of Georgia. “We’ve used posters, pamphlets, mailers, banners — you name it. We’ve planted false information in foreign newspapers. We’ve used what the British call ‘King George’s cavalry’: suitcases of cash.”
The "fakeness" Trump bellows on about is that for no apparent reason (he would say because it is part of an effort to de-legitimize his election) the news media is pretending this long running game suddenly matters. Or, if it's always mattered, they get to hide through this sudden focus on it their negiligence in not making it a story sooner.
None of this changes my assertion that Trump is a ruinous president. It's great that the corporations have ended their protest against Obama policies and direction by opening up their cash flows to the public economy, by default crediting Trump's watch. But really, they would have done that for anyone even Hillary. That's because 12 years of hoard-pouting money would be just too long to keep it up. Eventually those companies not so resistant to more regulation would have found their economic strength and begun to eclipse those that did. Trump's election unfortunately interrupted that.
As I've mentioned before too, I also support his tweeting habits. It's a brilliant interfacing effort between the top office of the land and regular people in real time. A natural advance of the fireside chats conducted by Franklin Roosevelt back in the day, but in today's digital context. However crazy his tweets may seem, they ring authentic and people really feel connected to them. Supporters in particular. I know future presidents will probably keep it up, but I am betting only in that dry "PR" voice that will sound like a run of taglines from a company product brochure. Trump knows enough at least to make this tool, and social media in general, count.
But yeah, he still sucks.
How to Share
Status quo institutions are attempting to kill the hyperlink and relegate you to social media. Resist by sharing this content's hyperlink. To share this content copy the URL below to your clipboard and paste it to the medium of your choice. Never let the world forget about the World Wide Web.